嬰兒營養:太近安慰嗎?

配方奶的市場價值€597和配方奶粉製造商已添加額外的營養物質如ω- 3和益生菌,使產品更接近母乳的營養狀況。相當正確地世界衛生組織規則來阻止嬰兒配方奶粉的促銷母乳的成本。但這是一個非常複雜的營銷世界的簡單視圖。上周公式公司紐迪希亞移交“重大捐贈”在英國兒童肥胖組修複,以幫助改善幼兒,促進幼兒的健康飲食教育的父母。公司屬於皇家紐米克被母乳喂養說客過於批評。紐迪希亞說公共衛生政策很大程度上被忽視的幼兒營養。如果是這種情況,那麼私人資金是一個重要的拚圖的一部分。但它也引發了一個問題:政府在全球範圍內可以做更多嗎?可能的一個時間最長的抵製對雀巢食品公司一直由說客,時至今日仍在肆虐。雀巢公司的抵製被擔憂引發嬰兒配方奶粉的瑞士公司的營銷實踐經濟發達程度較低的國家。一旦企業參與慈善團體、社會企業和將錢交給醫院,隻有人性,警鍾開始響了。我們應該小心跳到結論。私人資金可以是至關重要的,其中一些企業——例如雀巢——有足夠的現金。如果這些錢是用來幫助孩子過得更好,更健康的生活,在國家衛生服務和填補空白,然後所有的更好。另一方麵,如果這是犧牲一個廉價的營銷技巧的線交叉。 But at what point is too much industry involvement? Lobbyists would say we are already at that point. Industry would beg to differ. There is a need for a transparent system of checks and balances. If industry wants to avoid unnecessary criticism, it could offer its own system of checks and balances. The question is, who should this come from? And if companies really want to keep some distance they could contribute to a fund which is administered by an independent group. For now, it seems the gauntlet has been left for watchdog groups, including Baby Milk Action and International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN), to pick up and keep a close eye on companies' marketing tactics. A report by IBFAN listed some 3,000 violations by a dozen infant nutrition companies allegedly breaking rules on marketing. Nestle, Heinz and Numico were all featured in the report - but denied they had done anything wrong. The world's largest food company was blasted for "品牌“嬰兒出生時在中國的一些醫院手腕樂隊與雀巢公司的名稱和商標。雀巢表示,根據他們的代碼被允許捐贈醫療設備和材料係統”與一個公司的名稱和商標,但不是一個公式產品名稱或品牌。”應天在工業包裝的時候指關節和規定禁止任何參與,然後父母,行業和嬰兒都能發現自己的失敗者。如果它我們將離開問:誰是真正思考的孩子嗎?亞曆克斯·麥克納利是NutraIngredients.com的資深記者,生活和工作在法國,布魯塞爾和英國。如果你想評論,發送電子郵件到:nyrk.zpanyyl@qrpvfvbaarjf.pbz